Why 2K? President Signs Bill to Increase H-1B Filing Fees
By Murali Bashyam, Esq.
The United States Senate, in a largely
bi-partisan vote, passed a bill on August 5, 2010 which, among other things,
would impose an additional $2000 filing fee for companies that file H-1B
applications on behalf of foreign professional workers. This filing fee is
in addition to the normal H-1B filing fee of $2320 or $1570, depending on the
size of the company's workforce.
If you run a company and hire H-1B
professional workers, is it time to panic? Yes.
When this article was originally
written last week, the Senate bill was not law. It still had to be
reconciled with the House bill (HR 6080), which passed on August 10,
2010. However, it quickly did so and the bill was signed by
President Obama last Friday. The key question is why the Senate, House and
President are proposing this fee increase on employers in a weak economy? Illegal immigration is a hot topic
right now. In fact, it has been for years. You cannot turn on the
television without hearing a sound-bite on immigration from politicians who
really do not understand the topic. For example, Senator Chuck Schumer
(D), a sponsor of the Senate bill, says the following:
"There is a part of H-1B that is
abused, and it is by companies that are not American companies or even companies
that are making something. Rather, they are companies that take foreign folks,
bring them here, and then they stay here for a few years, learn their expertise,
and go back. We think we should increase the fees when they do that," the
Senator said.
In summary, Sen. Schumer is
basically saying:
- There is abuse in the H-1B
program, but none by American companies or companies that 'make something.'
- Companies hire foreign workers and
the workers learn their 'expertise' in the U.S.
- Foreign workers in the H-1B
program stay a few years and then go back to their home countries.
Other than acknowledging that there
is some abuse in the H-1B program, every other point or assumption made by Sen.
Schumer is completely false.
- Only an 'American' company can
hire an H-1B worker! The H-1B program is strictly for American employers to hire
foreign workers on a temporary basis. And even though a company may not 'make
something', it does not mean they are irrelevant or insignificant.
- Foreign workers do not come to the
U.S. to learn their expertise. They must have it before they can be issued H-1B
status! In fact, they must be offered a professional position -- one that
requires at least a Bachelor's degree (or equivalent). And they must
prove, with an evaluation by a U.S. credentials agency, that they have the
equivalent of a US Bachelor's degree specifically related to the position
offered. Most of these workers have many years of professional experience
as well before they come to the U.S.
The H-1B program is designed to be temporary. Foreign workers are supposed to
go home after six years! If we wanted them to stay, we wouldn't make the
Permanent Residency process so difficult and time-consuming.
Foreign workers come to the U.S., earn money and contribute to our economy
through consumption and taxation. Many apply for permanent residency so
they can live in the U.S. , but many also return home for family reasons
(or because the U.S. residency process takes far too long). Studies have
established that many of the immigrant workers who remain in the U.S. are
entrepreneurs who start businesses and employ U.S. workers. Sen. Schumer
fails to acknowledge the contributions foreign professional workers make to the
United States economy and culture.
We believe that most people in the
U.S. are pro-immigrant. In fact, polls have proven as much. But they
are for legal immigration and understandably against illegal
immigration. By increasing H-1B filing fees on U.S. employers, the
government goal is to raise more revenue to hire 1500 additional border patrol
agents to patrol our southern border. In essence, our government wants to
penalize companies that hire legal foreign workers under the H-1B program to
help prevent illegal immigration. Why should illegal immigration
negatively impact a U.S. company that legally hires a foreign professional
worker? It should not. These two issues are -- and should be --
separate.
Penalizing law-abiding employers in
a down economy is not good for our country. As Mohandas Pai, Director of
Human Resources for Infosys, said in reaction to the Senate bill, "it sends a
very negative message from America that highly skilled people are not welcome,
the markets are closing up." Instead of a being what is the backbone of
this great country, immigration now seems to be an unnecessarily negative and
divisive issue.
Let's hope for real, positive
change in our immigration policies, not just talk of it.
To learn more about Bashyam Spiro
LLP, please visit www.bashyamspiro.com.
|