 Tara Hunt
|  |
Mystery and the Modern Woman
By Tara Hunt
July
4th, 2010
After having coffee with a male
friend today, I came home and changed some of the information I share with my
"friends" on Facebook. I felt incredibly conflicted doing this.
The context of our conversation was
the following: I've been asked out at a fairly normal, even healthy rate, by men
I meet while out and about, but as soon as they 'friend' me on Facebook, there
seems to be an extreme amount of vanishing going on. According to my male
friend, my level of disclosure is too much for most men to stomach (in his
words, men want "mystery" or at least to think that there is a challenge to
getting a girl's number and information). Of course, my reaction was that any
man that couldn't handle a few foursquare check-ins and posts about my son and
life on FB wouldn't be man enough to deal with me anyway, so good riddance.
However I wondered in the back of my mind if removing my phone number and
tightening up the privacy settings just a wee bit wouldn't hurt anyway.
As I did this it occurred to me
that there was a new 'class' of women emerging in the world. When I open up FB,
most of the posts talking about personal lives, posting whereabouts and having
deep discussions about sex and modern love are by the women I have as friends on
FB. Many of them single. Most of them list their contact information, including
phone number. The number of posts by women seem to be far greater than those by
men -- and I have more male 'friends' than female by far (it's the circles I run
in). And this seems consistent with some of the most recent research about who
is participating on social networks (more women). Only a few years back,
though, it seemed to be the opposite.
Only 3 years ago, it seemed that
women were more closed in their use of social web tools:
Women
Who Tech Presentation: Women, Technology and Social Capital View more
presentations from Tara
Hunt.
Women were keeping their Twitter
accounts private, their Facebook accounts only open to close friends and they
certainly weren't joining the social networks that broadcast location at a major
rate. I'm not sure what the percentage is, but it does appear that women are
dropping the "women need to be private for safety" line in exchange for the
"women need to be public for success" line. At least in my circles.
Recently,
this article came out proclaiming that, well, we as women don't really
"need" men anymore as we are earning more money, more educated and have the
majority of the buying power now. Hell, we don't really even need them to make
babies thanks to modern science. My favorite line in the entire article
is:
Guys, one senior remarked … "are
the new ball and chain."
Still, as I remarked to my friend
(who thought I repeated the line "I don't *need* a man" too many times to be a
neutral statement), I would like to have a healthy, long term relationship with
a man, so I'm trying to get to the bottom of the vanishing problem (and
vanishing before I can even have an IRL date). As he put it, "You probably don't
want to be dating normal men anyway."
Bingo. "The normals" is a term I've
heard come up more and more lately. At one point it was used to describe non-early-adopter types
that you want to attract to your startup. At some point, it became people
who don't 'get' our crazy social web lifestyle. The lifestyle where we are
recording every moment, happening, thought and occasion in some sort of digital
form and quite often broadcasting it to everyone. It is quite addictive, really,
especially when it is so full of every day rewards: increasing your friend base
(geographically as well as numerically), getting you hired to teach others to do
this stuff, small bits of fame here and there and interesting moments every day.
Broadcasting and connecting with other broadcasters becomes a way for life to
get super interesting quickly. It isn't trivial, either. The knowledge I
accumulate through my random conversations daily has made me dangerous at a
cocktail party. Who needs to read the paper anymore when we pass around articles
before they are published and dissect them as a collective?
"The Normals" who are part of those
conversations are left in our opinionated dust. In our crazy social web world,
we gain one another's respect by our deep analysis of social issues. In the
'normal' world, we are seen as complete airbags. But there is nothing wrong with
our neverending quest for knowledge or desire to share every bit of that
knowledge accumulated (being the awesome knowledge brokers we are), it's just,
well, a little abnormal…for 'normal' people.
And it's worse for women. A man who
knows lots of stuff, shares it and gets excited by this knowledge is seen by
most as industrious, ambitious and smart. Not all women, but many women see this
man as attractive and someone with great earning potential. A woman who exhibits
a keen desire to share knowledge (for instance, to talk about data, the future
of economics and the changing socio-cultural climate) on the other hand is
really ONLY seen as attractive by men who are excited by those conversations.
For male "Normals", this woman is emasculating at best.
It's a stereotype stuck in another
era, really. As the presence of women as the leaders in the workforce grows, it
will be more an more crucial for women to be knowledgeable and ready to share
and strut that knowledge. And not only will it be necessary for our professional
lives, but, hell, it will become apparent that knowledge is freakin awesome, so
we will want to pursue more of it. At some point, "The Normals" will occupy the
minority, too, because survival will be directly tied to our knowledge and
ability to share it…but that's a whole other post.
I knew there was a reason that I've
found nerds sexier than jocks and rockstars as I've grown older (and wiser).
They seem to understand that holding her own in a debate on the future of
nuclear energy or whether China is the next superpower is the sexiest thing a
woman can do and that a woman who blogs, posts her geo-location and scours the
web for interesting articles to post on her FB profile is just being smart about
her data. The mystery that turns nerds on is in figuring out how to read between
the lines of her Twitter stream, how to decode the latest Blip.fm playlist to
find out how she really feels about you and looking at her Flickr favorites to
understand how she wants to see the world around her. Love is knowing that she
shares what is happening with thousands of people, but her innermost fears with
only you.
So I maintain that a man who asks
for my number but cannot handle my level of disclosure is not the man for this
modern woman. And I'm afraid it's his dating pool, not mine, that is getting
smaller.
www.horesepigcow.com
|